PCR棉籤測試是否為了防止“疫苗遲疑”而秘密的注射疫苗?

PCR棉籤測試是否為了防止“疫苗遲疑”而秘密的注射疫苗?- 準備轉變 / 2020年12月6日


Concern is growing that an innovative nanotech device developed at Johns Hopkins University may be used to secretly deliver the COVID19 vaccine to those people who are"vaccine hesitant."Certainly,the technology is real,but is their any merit to such a claim?

人們越來越擔心,約翰·霍普金斯大學開發的一種創新的納米技術設備可能被用來秘密地向那些"對疫苗猶豫不決"的人提供COVID19疫苗,當然,技術是真實的,但是他們的說法有什麼價值嗎?

Patrick Smith(November 25,2020)writing for hub.jhu.edu explains:

帕特里克·史密斯(2020年11月25日)為 hub.jhu.edu 撰文解釋道:

"Inspired by a parasitic worm that digs its sharp teeth into its host's intestines,Johns Hopkins researchers have designed tiny,star-shaped microdevices that can latch onto intestinal mucosa and release drugs into the body.David Gracias,a professor in the Whiting School of Engineering,and gastroenterologist Florin M.Selaru,director of the Johns Hopkins Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center,led a team of researchers and biomedical engineers that designed and tested shape-changing microdevices that mimic the way the parasitic hookworm affixes itself to an organism's intestines."

“受一種寄生蟲的啟發,約翰霍普金斯大學的研究人員設計了一種星形的微型裝置,這種裝置可以附著在腸道粘膜上,並向體內釋放藥物。他領導了一個由研究人員和生物醫學工程師組成的團隊,設計並測試了模擬寄生性鉤蟲粘附在生物體腸道的變形微型裝置。”



Called"theragrippers"these tiny devices are made of metal and a thin,shape-changing film.They are coated in heat-sensitive paraffin wax and each is no bigger than a speck of dust(see image below).

這些被稱為"theragrippers"的微小裝置是由金屬和一層薄的變形薄膜製成的。它們表面包裹著熱敏感的石蠟,每個都不會比一粒灰塵大(見下圖)。


Even the inventors of this microtechnology admit it can potentially transport any drug and release it gradually into your body and you won't even know anything about it.

即使是這種微技術的發明者也承認,它可以潛在地將任何藥物運輸並逐漸釋放到你的身體裡,而你甚至對它一無所知。

Check Out The Video Raising The Alarm On Bitchute:

查看視頻在 Bitchute 上拉響警報:https://www.bitchute.com/video/NJFz4TYgvCv2/


棉签 PCR 测试是否为了防止“疫苗迟疑”而秘密注射疫苗?



A Dodge to Defeat Vaccine Hesitation?
一個擊敗對疫苗遲疑的方法?

What reason would there be to engage in mass deception to secretly deliver a vaccine to defeat the coronavirus pandemic?

為什麼要進行大規模的欺騙,秘密地提供一種疫苗來對抗冠狀病毒大流行?

Surveys have been revealing a marked drop in public confidence that vaccines are really worth the risk.

調查顯示,公眾對疫苗真正值得冒險的信心明顯下降。

In 2019,the World Health Organization listed vaccine hesitancy as a top ten threat to global health.Only half of surveyed American adults would receive a coronavirus vaccine if it were available today.That number is down precipitously from over 70 percent since May 2020.

2019年,世界衛生組織將遲疑接種列為全球健康的十大威脅之一。只有一半接受調查的美國成年人會接受冠狀病毒疫苗,如果它是今天可用的。自2020年5月以來,這個數字已經從超過70%急劇下降。

But The Real Concern For Policymakers And The Vaccine Lobby Is That There Is A Huge Surge In The Medical Professions AGAINST Vaccines With Just 40 Percent Of Health Care Workers Saying They Were Likely To Get Vaccinated.

但是政策制定者和疫苗遊說團體真正擔心的是,反對疫苗的醫療行業激增,只有40%的醫護人員說他們有可能接種疫苗

But all such reluctance against the COVID jab will be in vain if a vaccine can be delivered by stealth merely when anyone takes the now ubiquitous PCR swab test(photo,top).The claim is that the dust-sized"theragrippers"can be implanted in the tips of PCR test swabs and be delivered to the innocent'"victim."

但是,如果只有當人們進行現在無處不在的 PCR 棉籤測試時,疫苗才能秘密地投放,那麼所有這些對抗 COVID 疫苗的不情願都將是徒勞的。他們聲稱,這種灰塵大小的"熱撕裂者"可以被植入 PCR 試驗棉籤的尖端,然後交付給無辜的"受害者"

It may be utterly immoral–and likely illegal–but it is certainly feasible because the Hopkins team published results of an animal study this week as the cover article in the journal Science Advances.

這可能是完全不道德的,而且很可能是違法的,但這是可行的,因為霍普金斯大學的研究小組本週在《科學進展》雜誌上發表了一篇封面文章,公佈了一項動物研究的結果。

Thousands of these sinister miniature theragrippers can be deployed in the GI tract via a simple,innocent swab given as part of the COVID19 test already taken by millions worldwide.Quite simply,you wouldn't feel a thing!

作為 COVID19測試的一部分,全世界已經有數百萬人進行了測試,通過一個簡單、無辜的拭子,成千上萬的這種邪惡的微型熱撕裂者可以部署在胃腸道。很簡單,你什麼都感覺不到!

"When the paraffin wax coating on the grippers reaches the temperature inside the body,the devices close autonomously and clamp onto the colonic wall.The closing action causes the tiny,six-pointed devices to dig into the mucosa and remain attached to the colon, where they are retained and release their medicine payloads gradually into the body.Eventually,the theragrippers lose their hold on the tissue and are cleared from the intestine via normal gastrointestinal muscular function."

"當夾持器上的石蠟塗層達到體內溫度時,裝置自動關閉,並緊緊粘附在結腸壁上。關閉動作導致微小的六點裝置深入粘膜,並保持連接到結腸,在那裡他們被保留和釋放他們的藥物有效載荷逐漸進入體內。最終,熱撕裂者失去了對組織的控制,通過正常的胃腸肌肉功能從腸道中清除。"

Absent any evidence to the contrary,are we to believe we have nothing to fear from being'poisoned'by the tiny critters?

如果沒有任何相反的證據,我們是否可以相信我們不用擔心被這些微小的生物"毒死"?

Vaccine Hesitancy On the Rise!

疫苗遲疑上升!

All we can do at this point is to maintain our guard and demand answers from policymakers as to when,and if,this frightening medical breakthrough will be deployed against an increasingly vaccine hesitant public.

在這一點上,我們所能做的就是保持警惕,並要求政策制定者回答何時,以及是否,這一可怕的醫學突破將被用來對付越來越猶豫不決的疫苗公眾。

We know the political class is already compromised on the issue,with so many high profile politicians having financial shares in vaccine companies.For example,only last year a top FDA medical adviser declared:'Congress is owned by pharma.'

我們知道政治階層已經在這個問題上妥協了,許多高調的政治家在疫苗公司擁有金融股份。例如,就在去年,FDA 的一位高級醫療顧問宣稱:國會為製藥公司所有。"

President Donald Trump took a shot at the influence of drug companies over Congress by lamenting:

唐納德·特朗普總統試圖抨擊製藥公司對國會的影響力,他哀嘆道:

"They Contribute Massive Amounts Of Money To Political People."

"他們向政治人物捐贈了大量資金。"



Last September,for example,the UK government published'Vaccine Hesitancy:Guidance and Interventions.'

例如,去年九月,英國政府發表了《疫苗猶豫不決:指導和干預》


The above document,in the section Lessons Learned(page,3 para.2)reveals how policymakers intend to get refusers to submit to their diktats:

上述文件在經驗教訓一節(第3頁第2部分)中揭示了決策者打算如何讓反對者服從他們的命令:

"Lessons learned:A unidirectional(top down)approach to communication is successfulamong some individuals and groups,but not all;success is dependent on the nature anddegree of hesitancy(Jarrett et al.,2015).Familiarity and trust with the messenger is akey feature in tackling hesitancy(WHO SAGE,2014a;Nayar et al.,2019).Vaccinehesitancy and political populism are driven by similar dynamics:a profound distrust inelites and experts(Kennedy,2019).Many experts believe that it is best to counterhesitancy at the population level(Kumar et al.,2016).Lessons learned have beencompiled in the Catalogue of interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy technical report(ECDC,2017).Some countries have turned to mandatory vaccination programmes(USA,France–albeit temporarily)–however experimental evidence shows that makingone vaccine mandatory might reduce people's uptake of others(Omer et al.,2019).Other approaches include penalties for non-compliance(Germany,Italy),or makingvaccination a requirement for e nrolment in childcare and school,which can help toincrease rates(USA,Australia).Although popular,the effectiveness of promotingalternative vaccination schedules to decrease hesitancy has not been studiedconclusively enough(National Research Council,2013;Feemster,2016)."

“教訓學習:單向(自上而下)溝通的方法在某些個人和群體中是成功的,但並非所有人;成功取決於猶豫的性質和程度(Jarrett等人,2015年)。熟悉和信任信使是解決猶豫的一個重要特徵(WHO SAGE,2014a;Nayar等人。,2019年),疫苗接種和政治民粹主義也受到類似因素的驅動動態:一個深刻的不信任選民和專家(Kennedy,2019 )。許多專家認為,最好在人口層面上消除猶豫(Kumar等人。,2016年)。經驗教訓已納入《應對疫苗猶豫的干預措施目錄技術報告》(ECDC,2017年)。一些國家已轉向強制性疫苗接種計劃(美國、法國——儘管是暫時的),但實驗證據表明,強制接種一種疫苗可能會降低人們對其他疫苗的吸收(Omer等人。,其他方法包括對違規行為的處罰(德國、意大利),或將疫苗接種作為兒童保育和學校入學的一項要求,這有助於提高發病率(美國、澳大利亞),推廣替代性疫苗接種計劃以減少猶豫的有效性還沒有得到足夠的專門研究(國家研究委員會,2013年;Feemster,2016年)。”

Meanwhile,in the United States the prominent White House Coronavirus task force front man,Dr Anthony Fauci has already expressed dismay at growing public disquiet on vaccine safety.

與此同時,在美國,著名的白宮冠狀病毒特別工作組負責人安東尼·福奇博士已經對公眾對疫苗安全問題日益增長的不安表示失望。

Fauci said it won't be easy getting large numbers of people vaccinated because of suspicion and"vaccine hesitancy,"especially among minority communities.

福奇說,由於懷疑和"疫苗猶豫不決",尤其是在少數民族社區,要讓大量人接種疫苗並不容易。

A recent Gallup Poll showed 48%of people of color in the U.S.said they'd take a coronavirus vaccine,compared to 61%of White respondents.Overall,about 58%of American poll respondents said they'd take a vaccine.

最近的一項蓋洛普民意調查顯示,在美國有色人種中,有48%的人表示他們會接種冠狀病毒疫苗,而白人受訪者中這一比例為61%。總的來說,大約58%的美國受訪者表示他們會接種疫苗。

We know for a fact pharmaceutical companies spend far more than any other industry to influence politicians.The UK's The Guardian reported(October 19,2017)that:

我們知道的事實是,製藥公司花在影響政客上的錢比其他任何行業都要多。英國《衛報》(The Guardian)報導(2017年10月19日):

"Drugmakers Have Poured Close To$2.5bn Into Lobbying And Funding Members Of Congress Over The Past Decade."

"過去10年,製藥商在遊說和資助國會議員方面投入了近25億美元。"

When the rubber meets the road what are corrupt politicians going to do?

當事情發生的時候,腐敗的政客們會怎麼做?

**Source


留言