針對丹麥首相提出的COVID-19限制 & 殺死1700萬隻水貂的訴訟
Lawsuit Filed Against Denmark PM For COVID-19 Restrictions & Killing 17 Million Minks
針對丹麥首相提出的COVID-19限制 & 殺死1700萬隻水貂的訴訟！- Humans Are Free
February 1, 2021
Trending Now
Sponsored by Revcontent
2021年2月1日
當下趨勢
由Revcontent贊助
A major lawsuit has been filed against the PM of Denmark for strict COVID-19 restrictions and for killing almost 17 million minks. According to the lawsuit, authorities did not recommend a major shutdown, as the PM Mette Frederiksen claimed.
丹麥首相因COVID-19的嚴格限制和殺死近1700萬隻水貂而被提起了一場重大訴訟。根據訴訟，當局並沒有像總理梅特·弗雷德里克森所說的那樣建議大規模停工。
It was herself and Barbara Bertelsen, the Prime Minister’s Head of Department, who would send alarm emails with attached articles from the media to the heads of department, creating the panic.
正是她本人和總理部門負責人芭芭拉·貝特爾森（Barbara Bertelsen）會向部門負責人發送附有媒體文章的報警郵件，製造恐慌。
Danish PM Accused Of Illegally Killing 17 Million Minks
丹麥首相被控非法殺害1700萬隻水貂
The Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has been accused by its citizens and advisory for strict COVID-19 restrictions which led to the killing of millions of minks related to the coronavirus mutation.
丹麥總理梅特·弗雷德里克森（Mette Frederiksen）被其公民和顧問指責對COVID-19進行嚴格限制，導致數百萬隻與冠狀病毒變異有關的水貂死亡。
The strict lockdown measure which was implemented was also very unconstitutional and now she is under scanner for such tyrannical measures undertaken by her.
當時實施的嚴格禁閉措施也是非常違憲的，現在她正因為自己採取的這種殘暴措施而受到檢查。
Advisory Response To Epidemic Act
流行病法的諮詢反應
The harsh measures of the Epidemic Act for killing all the minks in Denmark with no authorization from authorities for lockdowns and also the unconstitutional corona restrictions has led the Danish Prime Minister under severe crucial litigation.
《傳染病法》的嚴厲措施，在沒有得到當局封鎖授權的情況下殺死丹麥境內的所有水貂，以及違反憲法的科羅納（corona）限制，使丹麥首相面臨嚴重的關鍵訴訟。
At the request of the Ministry of Health and the Elderly, the advisory of the Joint Council of Freedom Movement submitted a response to the Epidemic Act stating that the Danish population has been led astray by the Minister of Health.
應衛生部和老年人部的要求，自由運動聯合委員會的顧問提交了一份對《流行病法》的答復，指出丹麥人口被衛生部長引入歧途。
At the same time the Ministry of Health has removed the word “Coercion” from the new bill and convened a consultation response with the help of the Empowerment Act of March 2020, and implemented a second law containing all the “necessary” provisions on coercion; namely BEK 36, which entered into force on 15 January this year.
與此同時，衛生部從新法案中刪除了“脅迫”一詞，並藉助2020年3月的《賦權法》召開了一次協商響應會議，並實施了第二部法律，其中載有關於脅迫的所有“必要”規定，即BEK 36，該法於今年1月15日生效。
The Advisory concluded that this was an expression of boundless infidelity. In their opinion, this new law is contrary to the Constitution, the ECHR and several other conventions.
顧問得出結論說，這是無限不忠的表現。他們認為，這項新法律違反了《憲法》、《歐洲人權公約》和其他一些公約。
The advisory further reinstated that such actions have created an insurmountable gap in the population between those who want to live in a state governed by law, and those who, by different, mainly unknown causes want to leave the path of democracy and human rights.
諮詢委員會進一步重申，這種行動在那些希望生活在法治國家的人和那些由於不同的、主要是未知的原因希望離開民主和人權道路的人之間造成了不可逾越的鴻溝。
Citizens Proposal Against Danish PM
反對丹麥首相的公民提案
Danish citizens’ proposal to put the Prime Minister before a Supreme Court for illegal mink killing reached the parliament.
丹麥公民提議將首相以非法殺害水貂罪提交最高法院。
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen had no legal authority to demand that all minks in Denmark be killed. A citizens’ proposal to put the Prime Minister before a Supreme Court on Thursday reached the required 50,000 supporters.
首相梅特弗雷德里克森沒有法律權力要求殺死丹麥所有的水貂。週四，一項公民提議將總理提交最高法院審理，這項提議獲得了所需的5萬名支持者。
The government decided in November that all minks in Denmark should be killed. This was supposedly done to prevent the mutated coronavirus, which spread from minks to humans, from inhibiting the effect of a vaccine.
去年11月，政府決定將丹麥境內的水貂全部殺掉。據說這樣做是為了防止變異冠狀病毒（從水貂傳播到人類）抑制疫苗的效果。
The decision to kill all minks, about 17 million, was announced by Mette Frederiksen at a press conference. Subsequently, it turned out that there was no legal authority to demand that all minks in Denmark be killed.
梅特·弗雷德里克森在記者招待會上宣布了殺死所有水貂（約1700萬隻）的決定。隨後，事實證明，沒有法律授權要求殺死丹麥所有的水貂。
Misleading The Nation Creating Panic
誤導全國製造恐慌
As per the lawsuit the Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen lied to the population and Parliament when stating that authorities had recommended lockdown which has misled everyone.
根據這起訴訟，丹麥首相梅特弗雷德里克森（Mette Frederiksen）向民眾和議會撒謊，稱當局建議封鎖，誤導了所有人。
Authorities did not recommend a major shutdown, as she claimed. It was herself and Barbara Bertelsen, the Prime Minister’s Head of Department, who would send alarm emails with attached articles from the media to the heads of department, creating the panic.
當局並沒有像她所說的那樣建議大規模停產。正是她本人和總理部門負責人芭芭拉·貝特爾森（Barbara Bertelsen）會向部門負責人發送附有媒體文章的報警郵件，製造恐慌。
Mette Frederiksen was earlier repeatedly saying that it was the ‘board group of authorities’ who recommended the closure of Denmark on 11th March 2020 which was misleading as per the lawsuit.
梅特·弗雷德里克森早些時候曾多次表示，是“當局董事會小組”建議在2020年3月11日關閉丹麥，這在訴訟中具有誤導性。
Major Lawsuit Against Danish PM
針對丹麥首相的重大訴訟
A lawsuit (read below) against the Prime Minister by the Organization for Information about Corona (OOC) was filed in the city court in Copenhagen.
關於科羅納信息組織（OOC）向哥本哈根市法院提起了針對首相的訴訟（見下文）。
A combined constitutional case was submitted on January 29th, 2021 where German immunologist Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and Dr Soren Ventegodt presented a report on coronavirus pandemic which states that there is no corona pandemic at all since the PCR test results are incorrect.
2021年1月29日，德國免疫學教授Sucharit Bhakdi博士和Soren Ventegodt博士提交了一份關于冠狀病毒大流行的報告，報告指出，由於PCR檢測結果不正確，根本不存在冠狀病毒大流行。
It was only recently that the WHO changed its PCR test ctiteria to cover-up false positives and cautioned experts not to rely solely on the results of a PCR test to detect the coronavirus.
直到最近，世衛組織才改變了其PCR檢測方法，以掩蓋假陽性，並提醒專家不要僅僅依靠PCR檢測結果來檢測冠狀病毒。
Worldwide Legal Action
全球法律訴訟行動
Last year, a Portuguese appeals court had ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
去年，葡萄牙一家上訴法院裁定
，PCR聚合酶鏈反應檢測不可靠，僅憑PCR聚合酶鏈反應檢測隔離人員是非法的。
As GreatGameIndia reported earlier, the standard coronavirus tests threw up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well.
正如GreatGameIndia早些時候報導的那樣，標準的冠狀病毒檢測每天都會產生大量的陽性病例。這些測試是根據錯誤的世衛組織協議進行的，這些協議的設計也包括假陽性病例。
This fact about false positives of PCR Tests was first noted in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, a Swiss biologist, emeritus professor, and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern.
瑞士生物學家、名譽教授、伯爾尼大學免疫學研究所前所長貝達·M·斯塔德勒博士在公開場合首次注意到了PCR檢測假陽性的事實。
Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority. WHO had called on countries to test as many patients as possible for coronavirus.
早些時候，世衛組織的檢測方案甚至受到芬蘭國家衛生局的質疑。世衛組織呼籲各國對盡可能多的患者進行冠狀病毒檢測。
Just a week back, a German court in a landmark ruling has declared that COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the government are unconstitutional. Thuringia’s spring lockdown was a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives,” the court said, justifying its decision.
就在一周前，德國法院在一項具有里程碑意義的裁決中宣布，政府實施的COVID-19封鎖違反了憲法。圖林根的春季封鎖是一個“災難性錯誤的政治決定，幾乎對人民生活的所有領域都造成了戲劇性的後果”，法院說，並為其決定辯護。
Earlier, an American federal judge ruled coronavirus restrictions in Pennsylvania as unconstitutional.
早些時候，美國聯邦法官裁定賓夕法尼亞州冠狀病毒的封鎖限制是違憲的。
Even the Belgian health experts have demanded an investigation into the WHO for faking a pandemic.
就連比利時的衛生專家也要求調查世衛組織是否偽造流行病。
In the past in 2010, the WHO was caught faking a pandemic and was forced to admit that its methodology of measuring the virality or the spread of the disease, instead of its severity was incorrect.
在過去的2010年，世衛組織被抓到假裝大流行，被迫承認其衡量病毒性或疾病傳播的方法，而不是其嚴重性是不正確的。
Source: GreatGameIndia.com
資料來源：GreatGameIndia.com
留言