當場抓獲：疾病預防控制中心（CDC）改變了檢測閾值，實際上消除了Vaxx'd患者中新的COVID病例
Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd
當場抓獲：疾病預防控制中心（CDC）改變了檢測閾值，實際上消除了Vaxx'd患者中新的COVID病例！- 準備轉變 / 2021年5月27日
作者：Kit Knightly，off-guardian.org:
New policies will artificially deflate"breakthrough infections"in the vaccinated,while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.
新政策將人為地抑制接種疫苗的"突破性感染"，而舊規則將繼續提高未接種疫苗的病例數。
The US Center for Disease Control(CDC)is altering its practices of data logging and testing for"Covid19"in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy"vaccines"are effective at preventing the alleged disease.
美國疾病控制中心(CDC)正在改變其數據記錄和"Covid19"測試的做法，以使實驗性的基因療法"疫苗"看起來在預防所謂的疾病方面是有效的。
They made no secret of this,announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May,(though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).
他們毫不掩飾這一點，於4月底/5月初在自己的網站上宣布了政策變化(儘管自然而然地沒有承認變化背後相當明顯的動機)。
The trick is in their reporting of what they call"breakthrough infections"–that is people who are fully"vaccinated"against Sars-Cov-2 infection,but get infected anyway.
關鍵在於他們對所謂的"突破性感染"的報告——即那些完全"接種"了 Sars-Cov-2病毒感染疫苗的人，但還是被感染了。
Essentially,Covid19 has long been shown–to those willing to pay attention–to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:
從本質上講，科維德19(Covid19)長期以來一直被證明是一個完全創造出來的流行病故事，其基礎是兩個關鍵因素：
1. False-positive tests.The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold(CT value)
1. 假陽性測試。不可靠的 PCR 檢測可以通過改變週期閾值(CT 值)來操縱報告大量的假陽性
2. Inflated Case-count.The incredibly broad definition of"Covid case",used all over the world,lists anyone who receives a positive test as a"Covid19 case",even if they never experienced any symptoms.
2. 誇大的個案數目。 "Covid 病例"的定義非常寬泛，在世界各地廣泛使用，將接受陽性檢測的人列為"Covid19病例"，即使他們從未經歷過任何症狀。
Without these two policies,there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all,and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.
如果沒有這兩項政策，根本就不會有明顯的大流行，現在 CDC 已經頒布了兩項政策變化，這意味著它們不再適用於接種疫苗的人群。
Firstly,they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected"breakthrough infections".
首先，他們正在降低他們的 CT 值時，測試樣本可疑的"突破性感染"。
From the CDC's instructions for state health authorities on handling"possible breakthrough infections"(uploaded to their website in late April):
疾病預防控制中心對各州衛生當局處理"可能突破性感染"的指示(四月下旬上載至其網站)：
For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold(Ct)value,submit only specimens with Ct value≤28 to CDC for sequencing.(Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)
對於已知循環閾值(Ct)的病例，只將 Ct 值≤28的標本提交 CDC 進行測序。 (在 Ct 值較高的情況下測序是不可行的。)
Throughout the pandemic,CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm,with labs around the world going into the 40s.
在整個流感大流行期間，CT 值超過35是正常的，世界各地的實驗室都接近40s。
Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result,despite experts warning that this was pointless(even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).
基本上，實驗室為了取得積極的結果，正在進行必要的周期運行，儘管專家警告說這是沒有意義的(即使 Fauci 自己也說超過35個週期的任何東西都是沒有意義的)。
But NOW,and only for fully vaccinated people,the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer.That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of"breakthrough infections"being officially recorded.
但是現在，只有完全接種疫苗的人，疾病預防控制中心將只接受28個週期或更少的樣本。這只能是為了減少正式記錄的"突破性感染"的數量而慎重作出的決定。
Secondly,asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as"covid cases".
其次，無症狀或輕微感染將不再被記錄為"孕婦病例"。
That's right.Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19,the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don't result in hospitalisation or death.
沒錯。即使以低 CT 值28採集的樣本可以被測序成據稱導致 Covid19的病毒，CDC 將不再保留那些不會導致住院或死亡的突破性感染的記錄。
From their website:
來自他們的網站：
As of May 1,2021,CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause.This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance.Previous case counts,which were last updated on April 26,2021,are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.
截至2021年5月1日，CDC 從監測所有已報告的疫苗突破性病例轉向專注於鑑別和調查由任何原因引起的住院病例或死亡病例。這種轉變將有助於最大限度地提高收集到的對臨床和公共衛生最重要的病例數據的質量。以往的個案統計數字上次更新是在二○二一年四月二十六日，現時只供參考，未來不會更新。
Just like that,being asymptomatic–or having only minor symptoms–will no longer count as a"Covid case"but only if you've been vaccinated.
就像這樣，沒有症狀或只有輕微症狀將不再被算作"Covid病例"，但只有當你接種了疫苗。
The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis.Meaning,from now on,unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.
疾病預防控制中心製定了新的政策，有效地建立了分級診斷系統。也就是說，從現在開始，未接種疫苗的人比接種疫苗的人更容易被診斷為 Covid19。
Consider…
思考一下..
Person A has not been vaccinated.They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and,despite having no symptoms,they are officially a"covid case".
A 人尚未接種疫苗。他們使用 PCR 檢測40個週期的 Covid 陽性，儘管沒有症狀，他們正式成為一個"Covid 病例"。
Person B has been vaccinated.They test positive at 28 cycles,and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever.Because they never went into a hospital and didn't die they are NOT a Covid case.
B 人已接種疫苗。他們在28個療程中檢測出陽性，並因高燒臥床6週。因為他們從來沒有去過醫院，也沒有死去，所以他們不是一個Covid病例。
Person C,who was also vaccinated,did die.After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems.Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles,so they're not officially a Covid case either.
同樣接種過疫苗的 c 人確實死了。由於高燒和呼吸系統問題住院週後。只是他們的 PCR 陽性檢測是29個週期，所以他們也不是正式的 Covid 病例。
The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a"disease"that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.
美國疾病控制與預防中心正在展示一種"疾病"的魅力，這種"疾病"的出現或消失取決於你如何衡量它。
To be clear:If these new policies had been the global approach to"Covid"since December 2019,there would never have been a pandemic at all.
需要明確的是：如果這些新政策自2019年12月以來就是全球對付"Covid"的辦法，那麼根本就不會有大流行病。
If you apply them only to the vaccinated,but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated,the only possible result can be that the official records show"Covid"is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.
如果你只對接種過疫苗的人使用它們，而對未接種過的人使用舊規則，那麼唯一可能的結果就是官方記錄顯示，"Covid"在後者中比前者更為普遍。
This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number,and systematically minimise the other.
這是一項旨在不斷擴大一個數字，並系統性地減少另一個數字的政策。
What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?
如果不是一個明顯的故意欺騙行為，那又是什麼呢？
留言