義大利法院對強制接種疫苗的歷史性裁決

Historic Decision Against Mandatory Vaccination by Italian Court！- Prepare For Change

義大利法院對強制接種疫苗的歷史性裁決！- Prepare For Change

By Edward Morgan - July 24, 2022
作者：愛德華.摩根 - 2022年7月24日

Harold Saive
哈羅德·塞夫

Historic Decision Against Mandatory Vaccination by Italian Court + Covid Vaccine Risk to Human Genome Now Legally Established (Italy)

義大利法院對強制接種疫苗的歷史性決定+新冠肺炎疫苗對人類基因組的風險現已合法確立（義大利）

https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/eu-issues/historic-decision-by-italian-court/

On July 6th, 2022, the court of Florence has approved a sentence annulling the measure taken by the Order of Psychologists of Tuscany against one of its members, the reason being: ‘the suspension of the exercise of the profession risks compromising primary individual rights such as the right to a livelihood and the right to work’.

2022年7月6日，翡冷翠法院準予了一項判決，廢除托斯卡納心理學家令對其一名成員採取的措施，原因是：“暫停行使該職業有可能損害主要的個人權利，如謀生權和工作權”。

The judge ruled that the psychologist doesn’t need to be vaccinated in order to do his job by establishing that:

法官裁定，心理學家無需接種疫苗即可完成其工作，其證明：

▪︎these substances don’t prevent infection and transmission. Therefore, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.
▪ ︎ 這些物質不能防止感染和傳播。因此，在義大利法律面前，不可能有義務。

▪︎She also recognises that these substances provokes severe adverse events. Therefore, it even less legitimate to force anybody to be injected.
▪ ︎ 她還認識到這些物質會引發嚴重的不良事件。因此，強迫任何人注射疫苗就更不合法了。

▪︎The judge put the dignity of the human being at the centre and referred twice to the period of Nazism and Fascism. Mandatory vaccination is possible if there is informed consent. For Covid injections, she explained that an informed consent is not possible as we don’t know the ingredients and the mechanisms of these substances because of industrial and alleged military secret.
▪ ︎ 法官以人的尊嚴為中心，兩次提到納粹主義和法西斯主義時期。如果有知情同意，可以強制接種疫苗。對於新冠肺炎注射，她解釋說，由於工業秘密和所謂的軍事秘密，我們不知道這些物質的成分和機制，因此不可能獲得知情同意。

This interim decision is grounded in serious conclusion: there is no right to suspend a citizen from the right to work based of this illegal request of vaccination with these experimental substances.

這項臨時決定的依據是一個嚴肅的結論：沒有權利因為這種非法要求接種這些實驗物質而暫停公民的工作權利。

With this historic court decision, “the Risk to human genome is now legally established” Renate Holzeisen, Italian attorney engaged in the defense of the Human Rights, said in an interview for an Italian radio.

根據這一歷史性的法庭判決，“人類基因組的風險現在已經合法確立”，義大利人權辯護律師雷娜特·霍爾澤森在接受義大利電臺採訪時表示。

“This could be a milestone” said Reiner Fuellmich during the Corona Committee 113, interviewing Renate Holzeisen.

“這可能是一個里程碑”，Reiner Fuelmich 在 Corona Committee 113 採訪 Renate Holzeisen 時說。

 

No obligation as the official data show that these experimental substances don’t prevent infection and transmission amongst people treated with 3 or more Covid shots.

沒有義務，因為官方資料表明，這些實驗物質不能防止接受3次或3次以上新冠肺炎疫苗注射的患者之間的感染和傳播。

First of all, the judge declares that based on the datas published by the Ministry of Health, AIFA (Italian Medicines Agency) and the SSN (Italian Health Services), it is very clear that these substances (aka Covid vaccines), defined several times by the judge as “experimental”, don’t prevent infection from the virus. For a mandatory vaccination, the substances should be proven to work.

首先，法官宣佈，根據衛生部、AIFA（義大利藥品管理局）和SSN（義大利衛生服務局）公佈的數據，很明顯，這些被法官多次定義為“實驗性”的物質（又名新冠肺炎疫苗）不能防止病毒感染。對於強制接種，應證明這些物質有效。

Therefore, as they don’t work, in front of the Italian law, there can not be an obligation.

因此，由於它們不起作用，在義大利法律面前，不可能有義務。

Doctor leading the intensive care in Verona has declared in television that all Covid patients in intensive care are people treated with 3 Covid shots.

負責維羅納重症監護的醫生在電視上宣佈，所有接受重症監護的新冠肺炎患者都接受了3次新冠肺炎疫苗注射治療。

 

Nobody can be forced to be injected as these substances provoke severe adverse events and this is based on official public data regarding adverse events.

由於這些物質會引發嚴重的不良事件，任何人都不能被迫注射，這是基於有關不良事件的官方公共數據。

In the court decision, the judge also recognises that these substances cause very serious side effects that can even lead to death, and also refers to the risk of genetic mutation.

在法庭判決中，法官還承認這些物質會引起非常嚴重的副作用，甚至可能導致死亡，並提到了基因突變的風險。

Therefore, it even less legitimate to force anybody to be injected.

因此，強迫任何人注射疫苗就更不合法了。

The judge declared that you cannot sacrifice life and health of an individual for the benefit of the population, but based on the public data coming from the Italian and European health authority, there is evidence that, at the end, there isn’t even a benefit for the community.

法官宣佈，你不能為了人民的利益而犧牲個人的生命和健康，但根據義大利和歐洲衛生局提供的公共數據，有證據表明，最終甚至沒有為社區帶來任何好處。

 

The Dignity of the human being is at the centre. Mandatory vaccination is not possible because there is NO informed consent due to industrial and alleged military secret regarding the ingredients and the mechanism of these injections.

人的尊嚴是中心。強制接種疫苗是不可能的，因為沒有關於這些注射的成分和機制的工業和據稱的軍事秘密的知情同意書。

Even if these substances would work to prevent these infection, after the Nazi and fascism period, it can not be a mandatory without an informed consent.

即使這些物質能夠預防這些感染，在納粹和法西斯主義時期之後，如果沒有知情同意，也不能強制使用。

The judge stated that there is no benefit for these substances BUT even if there was a benefit, we can not sacrifice the individual right in the name of the common interest, and put the dignity of the human being at the centre.

法官表示，這些物質沒有任何好處，但即使有好處，我們也不能以共同利益的名義犧牲個人權利，並將人的尊嚴置於中心。

The judge referred twice to the Nazi and fascism period, to the Italian Constitution article 32 highlighting that there is a reason why Dignity is at the centre of the first article of the German constitution.

法官兩次提到納粹和法西斯主義時期，提到義大利憲法第32條，強調尊嚴是德國憲法第一條的中心是有原因的。

She explained that an informed consent is not possible as we don’t know the ingredients and the mechanisms of these substances (industrial and alleged military secret).

她解釋說，知情同意是不可能的，因為我們不知道這些物質的成分和機制（工業秘密和所謂的軍事秘密）。

We should recall a group of Human Rights Italian activists who presented a Freedom of Information Act to the EMA and to the Italian Cares Authority asking for clear informations about the ingredients and the safety of these experimental substances aka Covid injections. As an answer, the EMA said that no information can be shared as there is a military secret in place.

我們應該回顧一下，一群義大利人權活動家向EMA和義大利關懷機構提交了一份資訊自由法案，要求提供有關這些實驗物質（即新冠肺炎注射劑）成分和安全性的明確資訊。作為回答，EMA表示，由於存在軍事秘密，因此無法共享任何資訊。

In his decision, the judge stated it: no information are available about these substances and even if we ask for information publicly, we don’t receive it. There is no informed consent.

法官在裁決中表示：沒有關於這些物質的資訊，即使我們公開要求提供資訊，我們也不會收到。沒有知情同意。

In this historic decision, the Tuscan judge concluded that based on all these, the discrimination of this psychologist and her suspension from work is totally illegal. Even before hearing the other part (Tuscany’s Chamber of Psychologists), because of the ongoing irreversible damage the plaintiff suffered and because of the clear evidence, she suspended the decision of the Tuscany’s Chamber of Psychologists to suspend the plaintiff and fixed a court hearing for 15th September.

在這一歷史性的判決中，托斯卡納法官得出結論，基於所有這些，對這位心理學家的歧視和她的停職是完全非法的。甚至在聽取另一方（托斯卡納心理學家協會）的意見之前，由於原告正在遭受不可挽回的損害，並且由於證據確鑿，她暫停了托斯卡納心理學家協會暫停原告的決定，並將法庭聽證會定在9月15日。

But the judge showed as well that there is no need to go to the constitutional court as we know that these substances (aka Covid-19 vaccine) don’t prevent infection. In front of the Italian law regarding mandatory Covid vaccination, it is enough to say the suspension from labour of healthcare workers is illegitimate because these substances don’t do what the constitution request.

但法官也表明，沒有必要去憲法法院，因為我們知道這些物質（又稱新冠肺炎疫苗）不能預防感染。在義大利關於強制性新冠肺炎疫苗接種的法律面前，可以說因此暫停醫療工作者的勞動是非法的，因為這些物質不符合憲法的要求。

Mandatory vaccination for many other categories of workers (teachers, fireworkers, military-members, policemen etc.) was already foreseen and for the citizen over 50 years the mandatory vaccination is still in force.

許多其他類別的工人（教師、消防員、軍人、警詧等）已經預見到強制接種，對於50歲以上的公民，強制接種仍然有效。

This is the first decision with which an Italian judge declared the material truth and the imposition of the treatment is radically illegitimate.

這是義大利法官第一次宣佈實質真相，實施這種待遇根本不合法。

———————

READ the Court Decision Here.
請閱讀此處的法院判決。

https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Tribunal-Firenze-06072022_EN.pdf

Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage

感謝您的免稅捐款，並幫助我們資助志願者網站和孤兒院

Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.

免責聲明：我們在變革準備（PFC）為您帶來的資訊不是由主流新聞提供的，囙此可能看起來有爭議。我們提出的意見、觀點、聲明和/或資訊不一定由變革準備組織、其領導委員會、成員、PFC工作人員或閱讀其內容的人員推動、支持、支持或同意。然而，他們希望是挑釁性的。請使用識別！使用邏輯思維、你自己的直覺以及你自己與源頭、精神和自然法則的聯繫來幫助你確定什麼是真的，什麼是假的。通過分享資訊和播種對話，我們的目標是提高對更高真理的意識和意識，從而將我們從這個物質領域的母體奴役中解放出來。

原文：https://prepareforchange.net/2022/07/24/historic-decision-against-mandatory-vaccination-by-italian-court/