幾乎所有人都聲稱相信的綠色大謊言
The Big Green Lie Almost Everyone Claims to Believe！- Prepare For Change
幾乎所有人都聲稱相信的綠色大謊言！-- 為改變做準備
By Derek Knauss - August 7, 20222
作者：Derek Knauss - 20222年8月7日
From theepochtimes.com:
來自 theepochtimes.com：
Almost every member of Congress, Democrat or Republican, pays homage to the Big Green Lie. So do all the past and remaining Conservative candidates vying to be prime minister of the UK and every candidate currently vying for the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada. So does virtually all of the mainstream press. The Big Green Lie—that carbon dioxide is a pollutant—is so pervasive that even those considered skeptics—including right-wing NGOs and pundits—generally adhere to the orthodoxy, differing not in their stated belief that CO2 is a pollutant but only in how calamitous a pollutant it is.
幾乎每一位國會議員，無論是民主黨還是共和黨，都對綠色大謊言表示敬意。所有過去和現在爭奪英國首相職位的保守黨候選人以及目前爭奪加拿大保守黨領導權的每一位候選人也是如此。幾乎所有的主流媒體也是如此。綠色大謊言 -- 二氧化碳是一種污染物 -- 是如此普遍，甚至那些被認為是懷疑論者 -- 包括右翼非政府組織和專家學者 -- 通常都堅持正統觀念，他們的不同之處不在於他們聲明的二氧化碳是一種污染物的信念，而只在於它是一種多麼可怕的污染物。
Because everyone now participates in the CO2-emissions-are-bad lie, the debate over climate policy hasn’t been over whether a CO2 problem exists but over how urgently CO2 needs to be addressed, and how it should be addressed. Do we have eight years left before Armageddon becomes inevitable or decades? Do we get off fossil fuels by building nuclear plants or wind turbines? Should we change our lifestyles to need less of everything? Or should we mitigate this evil—the view of those deemed climate minimalists—by shielding our continents from a rising of the oceans by enclosing them behind sea walls?
由於現在每個人都參與了二氧化碳排放是壞事的謊言，關於氣候政策的辯論已經不是關於二氧化碳問題是否存在，而是關於二氧化碳需要如何緊急解決，以及應該如何解決。在大決戰不可避免之前，我們還有八年時間，還是幾十年？我們是否要通過建造核電站或風力渦輪機來擺脫化石燃料？我們是否應該改變我們的生活方式，減少對一切的需求？或者我們應該通過把我們的大陸圍在海牆後面，使其免受海洋上升的影響來減輕這種邪惡 -- 那些被認為是氣候最小主義者的觀點？
With almost everyone across the political spectrum publicly agreeing that curbing CO2 is a good thing, the debate has been between those who want to do good quickly by reaching Net Zero in 2040 and sticks in the mud who want to slow down the doing of a good thing. With discourse careening down rabbit holes, almost everyone gets lost pursuing solutions to Alice-in-Wonderland delusions—and wasting trillions of dollars in the process.
隨著幾乎所有政治光譜的人都公開同意遏制二氧化碳是一件好事，辯論一直在那些想通過在2040年達到淨零排放而迅速做好事的人和那些想放慢做好事的人之間展開。隨著討論進入兔子洞，幾乎每個人都迷失了方向，去追求解決愛麗絲夢遊仙境的妄想，並在這個過程中浪費了數萬億美元。
Until the 2000s, when climate change was still called global warming and the mainstream media still noticed that none of the myriad predictions of a climate catastrophe were being borne out—the polar caps weren’t melting, Manhattan wasn’t about to be submerged, malaria wasn’t infecting the northern hemisphere—many exposed man-made climate change as a hoax. The leaked Climategate emails revealed how scientists had conspired to “hide the decline” in temperatures that didn’t conform to their models. The claim that 97 percent of scientists supported the global warming theory was exposed as a fraud, as was the claim that the 4,000 scientists associated with the IPCC endorsed its report—those 4,000 hadn’t endorsed it, and most hadn’t even read it but had merely reviewed parts of the report and often disagreed with what they read.
直到2000年，當氣候變化仍然被稱為全球變暖，並且主流媒體仍然注意到沒有一個關於氣候災難的無數預測被證實 -- 極冠沒有融化，曼哈頓沒有被淹沒，瘧疾沒有感染北半球 -- 許多人揭露人為的氣候變化是一個騙局。洩露的"氣候戰略門"電子郵件揭示了科學家如何密謀"隱藏"與他們的模型不相符的溫度下降。97%的科學家支持全球變暖理論的說法被揭露是一個騙局，與IPCC有關的4000名科學家支持其報告的說法也被揭露 -- 這4000名科學家並不支持該報告，大多數人甚至沒有讀過該報告，而只是審查了報告的部分內容，並經常不同意他們所讀的內容。
The claim that the “science was settled” on climate change never withstood scrutiny. Scientists around the world signed a series of petitions to dispute that claim. The 2008 Oregon Petition, spearheaded by a former president of the National Academy of Science and championed by Freeman Dyson, Albert Einstein’s successor at Princeton and one of the world’s most preeminent scientists, was signed by more than 31,000 scientists and experts who agreed that “the proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. … Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
關於氣候變化的"科學定論"的說法從未經受住審查。世界各地的科學家們簽署了一系列請願書，對這種說法提出異議。2008年俄勒岡州請願書，由美國國家科學院前院長帶頭，由普林斯頓大學阿爾伯特-愛因斯坦的繼任者、世界上最傑出的科學家之一弗里曼-戴森倡導，由超過31000名科學家和專家簽署，他們同意"對溫室氣體的擬議限制將損害環境，阻礙科學和技術的進步，並損害人類的健康和福祉。...... 此外，有大量的科學證據表明，大氣中二氧化碳的增加對地球的自然植物和動物環境產生許多有益的影響"。
圖：2021年11月13日，在蘇格蘭格拉斯哥舉行的聯合國氣候變化大會第二十六屆會議上，COP26主席Alok Sharma（C）發表講話。 (Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)
What is settled is the abject failure of the three-decade-long attempt by the bureaucracies of the 195 countries of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to convince anyone other than themselves, a credulous media, and a relatively few gullible people that climate change represents an existential threat. Poll after poll over the decades show the public gives climate change short shrift when asked to rank its importance.
塵埃落定的是，聯合國政府間氣候變化專門委員會195個國家的官僚機構長達30年的努力，除了說服他們自己、可信的媒體和相對少數受騙的人之外，沒有人相信氣候變化代表著生存的威脅，這是非常失敗的。幾十年來，一次又一次的民意調查顯示，當被要求對氣候變化的重要性進行排序時，公眾對其重視程度不足。
A Gallup Poll released this week, which asked Americans, “What do you think is the most important problem facing this country today?” found that climate change didn’t meet its criteria of the many issues worth listing. As Gallup noted, “Many parts of the nation have suffered record heat in recent weeks, and other regions have received record flooding. But a low 3% of Americans mention the weather, the environment or climate change as the nation’s top problem.” So, too, last month, where “just 1 percent of voters in a recent New York Times/Siena College poll named climate change as the most important issue facing the country …. Even among voters under 30, the group thought to be most energized by the issue, that figure was 3 percent.”
本週發布的一項蓋洛普民意調查問美國人，"你認為這個國家今天面臨的最重要的問題是什麼？"發現氣候變化並不符合它在許多值得列出的問題中的標準。正如蓋洛普所指出的，"最近幾週，美國的許多地方遭受了創紀錄的高溫，其他地區也收到了創紀錄的洪水。但只有3%的美國人提到天氣、環境或氣候變化是國家的首要問題"。上個月也是如此，"在最近的《紐約時報》/Siena學院的民意調查中，只有1%的選民將氣候變化列為國家面臨的最重要問題....。即使是在30歲以下的選民中，這個被認為對這個問題最感興趣的群體，這個數字也是3%。"
Although most elites continue to pay lip service to the urgency of curbing carbon dioxide, their actions belie their words, whether judged by their penchant for private jet travel or their disingenuous commitment to climate-related policies. According to an International Energy Agency (IEA) announcement last week, coal is once again king: Global coal demand this year will “match the annual record set in 2013, and coal demand is likely to increase further next year to a new all-time high.” The IEA’s assessment comports with a worldwide embrace of coal that includes the European Union, until recently the world’s most zealous climate scold. The EU is now walking back its Net Zero commitments.
儘管大多數精英們繼續在口頭上表示遏制二氧化碳的緊迫性，但他們的行動掩蓋了他們的言論，無論是從他們對私人飛機旅行的偏好還是對氣候相關政策的虛偽承諾來看。根據國際能源署（IEA）上週的公告，煤炭再次成為國王。今年的全球煤炭需求將"與2013年創造的年度記錄相當，明年的煤炭需求可能會進一步增加，達到歷史新高"。國際能源署的評估與全世界對煤炭的擁護相吻合，其中包括歐盟，直到最近，歐盟還是世界上最熱心的氣候斥候。歐盟現在正在收回其淨零排放的承諾。
In some countries, governments are not so much walking back climate policies as unabashedly kicking them out. Calling wind turbines “fans” that harm the environment and cause “visual pollution” without providing much energy, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said the government will end the subsidies and stop issuing permits for new wind projects. Israel is also set to pull the plug on the country’s wind industry, its environmental protection minister arguing that wind provides a “negligible contribution” to the country’s power system “compared to the potential for harm to nature, which is high.”
在一些國家，政府與其說是收回氣候政策，不如說是毫不掩飾地將其踢出。墨西哥總統安德烈斯-曼努埃爾-洛佩斯-奧布拉多（Andrés Manuel López Obrador）稱風力渦輪機是危害環境的"風扇"，會造成"視覺污染"，但卻不能提供大量能源，他說政府將終止補貼，並停止為新的風力項目發放許可證。以色列也將停止該國的風能產業，其環境保護部長認為，風能為該國的電力系統提供了"可忽略不計的貢獻"，"相比之下，它對自然的潛在危害很大"。
Recognizing renewables as economic and environmental boondoggles, as Mexico and Israel have done, is a step toward puncturing the lie that a fuel that emits carbon dioxide can be sensibly replaced. The other shoe to drop is the lie that carbon dioxide-emitting fuels should be replaced.
正如墨西哥和以色列所做的那樣，承認可再生能源是經濟和環境的災難，是朝著戳穿"排放二氧化碳的燃料可以被明智地取代"的謊言邁出的一步。另一隻鞋要扔掉的是關於排放二氧化碳的燃料應該被取代的謊言。
The fantastical claim that CO2 is a pollutant was cut out of whole cloth. The 2008 statement by the 31,000 experts—that “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate” is as true today as it was then, and as it always has been. No scientist anywhere at any time has shown that manmade CO2 emissions—aka nature’s fertilizer—do any harm to anything.
二氧化碳是一種污染物的奇談怪論是無中生有的。2008年31000名專家的聲明 -- "沒有令人信服的科學證據表明人類釋放的二氧化碳、甲烷或其他溫室氣體正在或將在可預見的未來導致地球大氣層的災難性升溫和地球氣候的破壞"，今天和當時一樣，一直都是事實。任何地方的科學家在任何時候都沒有證明人為的二氧化碳排放 -- 也就是大自然的肥料 -- 會對任何東西造成傷害。
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website and Orphanage
感謝您的免稅捐款並幫助資助我們的志願者網站和孤兒院
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.
免責聲明：我們準備變革 (PFC) 為您提供主流新聞未提供的信息，因此可能會引起爭議。 我們提供的意見、觀點、聲明和/或信息不一定得到準備變革、其領導委員會、成員、與 PFC 合作的人員或閱讀其內容的人員的宣傳、認可、支持或同意。 但是，他們希望具有挑釁性。 請使用辨別力！ 使用邏輯思維、你自己的直覺以及你自己與源頭、精神和自然法則的聯繫來幫助你確定什麼是真的，什麼不是。 通過共享信息和播種對話，我們的目標是提高對更高真理的意識和意識，以使我們擺脫對這個物質領域的母體的奴役。
原文：https://prepareforchange.net/2022/08/07/the-big-green-lie-almost-everyone-claims-to-believe/
留言