《柳葉刀》終於承認自然免疫遠勝於mRNA COVID "疫苗接種"

The Lancet Finally Acknowledges That Natural Immunity Is Far Superior to mRNA COVID “Vaccination”

《柳葉刀》終於承認自然免疫遠勝於mRNA COVID "疫苗接種"

來源：SHTF plan
by Ethan Huff | Feb 23, 2023 | Headline News | 0 comments
作者：Ethan Huff | 2023年2月23日 | 頭條新聞 |

This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News.
本文由 Ethan Huff 最初發表於 Natural News。

A new study published in The Lancet confirms that natural immunity to the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is far superior to the artificial “immunity” generated by the so-called “vaccines.”

發表在《柳葉刀》上的一項新研究證實，武漢冠狀病毒（Covid-19）的自然免疫力遠遠優於所謂"疫苗"產生的人工"免疫力"。

The paper includes a systematic review and meta-analysis of 65 other studies conducted worldwide. All of them provide overwhelming support for what many scientists and doctors have been saying about natural infection versus synthetic injection.

這篇論文包括對全球範圍內進行的其他65項研究的系統回顧和薈萃分析。所有這些都為許多科學家和醫生一直以來關於自然感染與合成注射的說法提供了壓倒性的支持。

According to the study’s funding, acquiring and recovering from covid naturally provides strong, lasting protection against severe health outcomes at a level “as high, if not higher” than the temporary-at-best protection conferred by the experimental shots.

根據該研究的資金，自然獲得和恢復covid提供了強大、持久的保護，防止嚴重的健康後果，其水平"如果不高的話，也和實驗性注射所賦予的臨時保護一樣高"。

“The Lancet is finally acknowledging what doctors and scientists have been gaslit for saying for years – that natural immunity provides superior protection to experimental vaccines,” said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman and chief litigation counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

"兒童健康保護組織（CHD）主席兼首席訴訟律師小羅伯特-肯尼迪說："《柳葉刀》終於承認了醫生和科學家多年來一直在說的話 -- 自然免疫力提供了比實驗性疫苗更好的保護。

“Only the tsunami of propaganda and censorship from the pharma/government biosecurity cartel and the controlled media persuaded the public that Pfizer and Moderna were better at protecting the human immune system than God and evolution.”

"只有來自製藥業/政府生物安全卡特爾和受控媒體的海嘯式宣傳和審查，才說服了公眾，認為輝瑞和Moderna在保護人類免疫系統方面比上帝和進化更有優勢"。

(Related: Remember when The Lancet published, then retracted, a paper mocking the lab-origin theory for covid?)
(相關。還記得《柳葉刀》雜誌發表了一篇嘲笑實驗室起源理論的論文，然後又收回了，嘲笑covid。）
https://naturalnews.com/2021-09-24-mocking-covid-lab-origin-lancet-issues-retraction.html

 

CDC now admits covid jab “immunity” barely lasts at all before turning negative
疾病預防控制中心現在承認covid疫苗的"免疫力"在變成陰性之前幾乎沒有持續力。

Even when compared to the immunity allegedly provided by two doses of mRNA (messenger RNA) from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, natural immunity from infection lasts much longer and provides much better protection, the study found.

研究發現，即使與據稱由輝瑞-生物技術公司或Moderna公司的兩劑mRNA（信使RNA）提供的免疫力相比，感染的自然免疫力持續的時間更長，提供的保護也更好。

Natural immunity, the researchers found, was at least 88.9 percent effective against severe disease, hospitalization, and death for all covid “variants” 10 months after infection. It also provides 78.6 percent protection against reinfection for all variants except omicron BA.1, for which only 45.3 percent protection occurs.

研究人員發現，自然免疫力在感染10個月後對所有covid"變種"的嚴重疾病、住院治療和死亡至少有88.9%的效果。它還為所有變種提供了78.6%的保護，以防止再次感染，但Omicron BA.1除外，它只發生45.3%的保護。

Back in October, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) met to discuss data on so-called “vaccine-acquired immunity,” which the authorities have been touting all this time as preferable to natural immunity.

早在10月，美國疾病控制和預防中心（CDC）的免疫實踐諮詢委員會（ACIP）開會討論了所謂的"疫苗獲得性免疫"的數據，當局一直在吹捧它比自然免疫更可取。

What the CDC found and discussed is that after two or even three injections of a covid shot, jab-induced immunity drops to zero after just six months before turning negative. Negative efficacy, just to clarify, means one’s immune system is worse off and is basically now attacking itself like AIDS.

疾病預防控制中心發現並討論的是，在注射兩針甚至三針疫苗後，注射引起的免疫力在短短六個月後就降至零，然後變成負效。負效，只是為了澄清，意味著一個人的免疫系統更差了，基本上現在像艾滋病一樣在自我攻擊。

Even though all protection from reinfection wanes over time to some degree, jab-induced protection is the worst kind of protection in that it is not protection at all but rather a temporary bandage that destroys the immune system in the end.

儘管所有防止再感染的保護措施都會隨著時間的推移在某種程度上減弱，但注射疫苗引起的保護是最糟糕的一種保護，因為它根本就不是保護，而是一種臨時的繃帶，最終會破壞免疫系統。

Amazingly, the new study was funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Its authors include Dr. Christopher Murray, director of The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), which is also funded by billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates.

令人驚訝的是，這項新的研究得到了比爾和梅林達-蓋茨基金會的部分資助。其作者包括克里斯托弗-默里博士，他是衛生計量與評估研究所（IHME）的主任，該研究所也由億萬富翁優生學家比爾-蓋茨資助。

IHME, by the way, was “largely responsible for the notoriously exaggerated mortality calculations that overestimated COVID deaths by 20-fold at the COVID pandemic’s outset,” according to Kennedy.

順便說一下，IHME"在很大程度上對臭名昭著的誇大死亡率的計算負責，在COVID大流行開始時將COVID的死亡人數高估了20倍"，肯尼迪說。

The study comes as some authorities in some areas mull restricting people’s access to travel, venues, and even workplaces based on their jab status. If the jabs do not even work, then how can anyone require them as a condition of living (not that any form of compulsory medicine is legitimate, no matter how “effective” it supposedly is)?

這項研究是在一些地區的當局考慮根據人們的注射狀態來限制他們的旅行、場所、甚至工作場所時進行的。如果接種疫苗甚至沒有效果，那麼怎麼會有人要求將其作為生活條件呢（並不是說任何形式的強制醫療都是合法的，不管它據說有多 "有效"）？

“While framing this as an acknowledgment that natural immunity confers protection, what it is also doing is providing tacit agreement that government-imposed policies restricting travel are acceptable,” commented Dr. Meryl Nash, an internist, and epidemiologist, about the findings.

"內科醫生和流行病學家梅麗爾-納什（Meryl Nash）博士評論說："雖然把這說成是承認自然免疫力可以提供保護，但它也是在默許政府實施的限制旅行的政策可以接受。

“It furthermore provides tacit approval of vaccine passports.”

"它還進一步提供了對疫苗護照的默許。”

原文：https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/the-lancet-finally-acknowledges-that-natural-immunity-is-far-superior-to-mrna-covid-vaccination