Researchers who tried to bury the aluminum-autism link now face calls to RETRACT their fraudulent study（研究人員試圖掩蓋鋁與自閉症的關係，現在卻要面對要求他們撤回欺詐研究的呼聲）
Researchers who tried to bury the aluminum-autism link now face calls to RETRACT their fraudulent study（研究人員試圖掩蓋鋁與自閉症的關係，現在卻要面對要求他們撤回欺詐研究的呼聲）
來源：Prepare For Change
By Derek Knauss -
作者：德里克·克瑙斯 -
August 10, 2025
2025年8月10日
For years, parents and independent researchers have warned that aluminum in vaccines could be fueling the autism epidemic. Now, a bombshell investigation reveals that a Danish study, widely touted by mainstream media as “proof” of aluminum’s safety, was built on fraudulent methodology — and even its corrected data still hides the truth.
多年來，家長和獨立研究人員一直警告說，疫苗中的鋁可能會助長自閉症的流行。現在，一項重磅調查揭露，一項被主流媒體廣泛吹捧為鋁安全性「證明」的丹麥研究，是建立在欺詐的方法之上 -- 甚至其修正後的數據仍掩蓋了真相。
The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, initially claimed no link between aluminum adjuvants and autism. But when corrected data surfaced, it showed the opposite: children exposed to higher aluminum doses had a significantly increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. The study’s authors, tied to vaccine-promoting institutions, manipulated data, excluded high-risk children, and refused to release raw findings — raising serious questions about who’s really protecting public health.
發表在《內科年刊》上的這項研究最初聲稱鋁佐劑與自閉症之間沒有任何關聯。但當修正後的數據浮出水面時，卻顯示出相反的結果：接觸較高鋁劑量的兒童患神經發展障礙的風險顯著增加。該研究的作者與疫苗推廣機構有聯繫，他們篡改了數據，排除了高風險兒童，並拒絕公布原始結果 -- 這引起了公眾對誰在真正保護公眾健康的嚴重質疑。
Key points:
關鍵點：
▪︎ The study compared children with nearly identical aluminum exposure levels, ensuring inconclusive results.
▪︎ 這項研究比較了幾乎相同鋁曝露量的兒童，確保了不確定的結果。
▪︎ Researchers excluded children with “implausibly high” vaccine doses — those most likely to show aluminum-related harm.
▪︎ 研究人員排除了疫苗劑量“高得令人難以置信”的兒童——那些最有可能表現出與鋁相關的危害的兒童。
▪︎ No unvaccinated control group was included, a fatal flaw that skewed the findings.
▪︎ 沒有包括未接種疫苗的對照組，這是一個扭曲研究結果的致命缺陷。
▪︎ Corrected data revealed a statistically significant autism link, contradicting the authors’ original claims.
▪︎ 更正後的數據揭示了具有統計學意義的自閉症聯繫，與作者最初的說法相矛盾。
▪︎ Critics accuse the researchers of conflicts of interest, as their institution profits from vaccine distribution.
▪︎ 批評者指責研究人員存在利益衝突，因為他們的機構從疫苗分銷中獲利。
A study rigged from the start
一項從一開始就被操縱的研究
The Danish research team, led by Anders Hviid of the Statens Serum Institut — a government agency that procures vaccines — claimed their analysis of 1.2 million children found “no evidence” linking aluminum to autism. But the study’s design guaranteed this outcome. Instead of comparing vaccinated children to unvaccinated ones, they only compared kids who received slightly different aluminum doses.
由採購疫苗的政府機構 Statens Serum Institut 的 Anders Hviid 領導的丹麥研究小組聲稱，他們對一百二十萬名兒童的分析發現 “沒有證據” 將鋁與自閉症聯繫起來。但該研究的設計保證了這一結果。他們沒有將接種疫苗的兒童與未接種疫苗的兒童進行比較，而是只比較了接受鋁劑量略有不同的兒童。
“It’s like comparing smokers who smoke 19 cigarettes a day to those who smoke 20 and declaring cigarettes harmless,” said Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense. “This isn’t science — it’s statistical trickery.”
“這就像將每天吸 19 支香煙的吸煙者與每天吸 20 支香煙的吸煙者進行比較，並宣稱香煙是無害的”，兒童健康防禦首席科學官布萊恩·胡克博士說。“這不是科學——這是統計學的詭計。”
Even worse, the researchers dismissed 34,000 children who received unusually high vaccine doses before age 2, labeling their cases as “documentation errors.” By excluding these children — who may have shown the clearest signs of aluminum toxicity — the study erased critical red flags.
更糟糕的是，研究人員駁回了 34,000 名在 2 歲之前接種異常高劑量疫苗的兒童，並將他們的病例標記為“文件錯誤”。通過排除這些兒童——他們可能表現出最明顯的鋁中毒跡象 ——該研究消除了嚴重的危險信號。
The corrected data they don’t want you to see
他們不希望您看到的更正後的數據
Days after publication, the journal quietly updated the study’s supplementary materials, admitting the original version contained “incorrect” data. The corrected figures revealed a shocking truth: children who received higher aluminum doses had a 9.7 per 10,000 increased risk of autism compared to moderately dosed children.
發表幾天後，該雜誌悄悄更新了該研究的補充材料，承認原始版本包含“不正確”的數據。更正後的數字揭示了一個令人震驚的事實：與中等劑量的兒童相比，接受較高鋁劑量的兒童患自閉症的風險每 9.7 人增加 10,000 人。
Karl Jablonowski, senior research scientist at CHD, told The Defender: “The original version erased nearly 3,000 neurodevelopmental diagnoses. They made the sick kids disappear.”
冠心病高級研究科學家卡爾·雅布洛諾夫斯基（Karl Jablonowski）告訴《捍衛者》：“原始版本刪除了近 3,000 個神經發育診斷。他們讓生病的孩子消失了。‘’
Yet, despite the corrected data, the authors refused to revise their conclusions. Hviid, who previously told media outlets aluminum was safe, went on summer vacation, conveniently avoiding questions.
然而，儘管數據經過更正，作者仍拒絕修改他們的結論。赫維德此前曾告訴媒體鋁是安全的，他去放暑假，方便地迴避問題。
Aluminum’s dark history — and why they’re covering it up
鋁的黑暗歷史——以及他們為何要掩蓋它
Aluminum is a known neurotoxin. Independent research shows it:
鋁是一種已知的神經毒素。獨立研究表明：
▪︎ Crosses the blood-brain barrier, accumulating in brain tissue.
▪︎ 穿過血腦屏障，積聚在腦組織中。
▪︎ Triggers IL-6, an inflammatory protein linked to autism.
▪︎ 觸發 IL-6，一種與自閉症有關的炎症蛋白。
▪︎ Is associated with a 36% higher asthma risk in U.S. children.
▪︎ 與美國兒童哮喘風險高出 36% 有關。
Chris Exley, Ph.D., a leading aluminum toxicologist, called the study a “nonscientific farce”: “They didn’t measure aluminum levels in the children’s blood or tissue. Why? Because real data would’ve exposed the truth.”
知名鋁毒物學家 Chris Exley 博士稱這項研究為「不科學的鬧劇」： "他們沒有測量兒童血液或組織中的鋁含量。為什麼？因為真實的數據會揭露真相"。
The study’s authors work for an institute that profits from vaccines. Hviid also received funding from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, tied to pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk. Critics argue this isn’t just bad science — it’s a conflict of interest.
這項研究的作者為一家從疫苗獲利的研究所工作。Hviid 也接受了 Novo Nordisk 基金會的資助，該基金會與製藥巨頭 Novo Nordisk 有聯繫。批評者認為這不僅是糟糕的科學，更是利益衝突。
The coming propaganda war
即將到來的宣傳戰
With Robert F. Kennedy Jr. now leading HHS and pushing for vaccine safety reforms, the medical establishment is scrambling to discredit aluminum concerns. Expect a flood of similarly flawed studies in the coming months, amplified by Big Tech and corporate media.
隨著小羅伯特·甘迺迪 （Robert F. Kennedy Jr.） 現在領導 HHS 並推動疫苗安全改革，醫療機構正在爭先恐後地抹黑鋁問題。預計未來幾個月將出現大量類似有缺陷的研究，大型科技公司和企業媒體將放大這些研究。
James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., founder of IPAK-EDU, warned: “They’re priming algorithms to push junk science and drown out dissent. Parents deserve real answers, not statistical fraud.”
IPAK-EDU 創始人 James Lyons-Weiler 博士警告說：“他們正在啟動算法來推動垃圾科學並淹沒異議。父母應該得到真正的答案，而不是統計欺詐。‘’
The fight for transparency is just beginning. Until independent researchers gain access to raw data — and until unvaccinated children are included in studies — the truth about aluminum’s role in autism will remain buried.
爭取透明度的鬥爭才剛開始。在獨立研究人員獲得原始數據之前，直到未接種疫苗的兒童被納入研究，關於鋁在自閉症中的作用的真相將仍然被埋藏。
From censoredscience.com
Your Tax Free Donations Are Appreciated and Help Fund our Volunteer Website
感謝您的免稅捐款，並為我們的志願者網站提供資金
Disclaimer: We at Prepare for Change (PFC) bring you information that is not offered by the mainstream news, and therefore may seem controversial. The opinions, views, statements, and/or information we present are not necessarily promoted, endorsed, espoused, or agreed to by Prepare for Change, its leadership Council, members, those who work with PFC, or those who read its content. However, they are hopefully provocative. Please use discernment! Use logical thinking, your own intuition and your own connection with Source, Spirit and Natural Laws to help you determine what is true and what is not. By sharing information and seeding dialogue, it is our goal to raise consciousness and awareness of higher truths to free us from enslavement of the matrix in this material realm.
免責聲明：我們 Prepare for Change （PFC） 為您帶來的訊息是主流新聞未提供的，因此可能看起來有爭議。我們提供的意見、觀點、聲明和/或資訊不一定由 Prepare for Change、其領導委員會、成員、與 PFC 合作的人員或閱讀其內容的人員推廣、認可、擁護或同意。然而，它們有望具有挑釁性。請運用辨別力！使用邏輯思維、您自己的直覺以及您自己與源頭、精神和自然法則的聯繫來幫助您確定什麼是真實的，什麼是假的。透過分享資訊和播種對話，我們的目標是提高對更高真理的意識和認識，將我們從這個物質領域矩陣的奴役中解放出來。
留言