大重置正在使文明的時鐘倒轉

The Great Reset Is Turning Back The Clock On Civilization

大重置正在使文明的時鐘倒轉！- Humans Are Free

June 15, 2022
2022年6月15日

The covid-19 pandemic featured an unprecedented fusion of the interests of large and powerful corporations with the power of the state. Democratically elected politicians in many countries failed to represent the interests of their own citizens and uphold their own constitutions and charters of rights.

新冠肺炎大流行的特點是，大型強大公司的利益與國家權力空前融合。許多國家的民選政治家未能代表本國公民的利益，也未能維護本國憲法和權利憲章。

Specifically, they supported lockdown measures, jjab mandates, the suppression of a variety of early treatment options, the censorship of dissenting views, propaganda, interference in the private spheres of individuals, and the suspension of various forms of freedom. All of these policies and measures were centrally designed by the social engineers of the pandemic.

具體而言，他們支持封鎖措施、注射授權、壓制各種早期治療選擇、審查不同意見、宣傳、干涉個人私人領域以及暫停各種形式的自由。所有這些政策和措施都是由大流行的社會工程師集中設計的。

Globalists, who are obsessed with societal control, decided to take advantage of the pandemic in order to increase their authoritarian power. Prominent among them was, Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of World Economic Forum (WEF). In June 2020, he stated that “the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world.” According to him, “every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed.”

痴迷於社會控制的全球主義者決定利用這場流行病來增強他們的威權。其中最著名的是世界經濟論壇（WEF）創始人兼執行主席克勞斯·施瓦布。2020年6月，他表示，“這場大流行代表著一個罕見但狹窄的機會之窗，可以反思、重新想像和重塑我們的世界。”按照他的說法，“從美國到中國，每個國家都必須參與，從石油和天然氣到科技，每個行業都必須轉型。”

It is no secret that the WEF has focused on accelerating the implementation of central planning for the entire global population since the early days of pandemic. This plan to establish a new world order, known as the Great Reset, was a key theme at the recent annual meeting of the WEF, which was held during May 22–26 in Davos, Switzerland.

自大流行初期以來，世界經濟論壇一直致力於加快對全球所有人口實施中央規劃，這已不是什麼秘密。5月22日至26日在瑞士達沃斯舉行的世界經濟論壇（WEF）最近的年會上，這一建立新世界秩序的計劃是一個關鍵主題，被稱為“大重置”。

Drastic changes to the world order like the Great Reset do not happen spontaneously; rather, they are designed by global policy makers, including influential billionaires, politicians, celebrities, biased academics, wealthy philanthropists, and the bureaucrats of international organizations and institutions. These types of people support social engineering, because it will enable them to acquire control over the world’s wealth and natural resources, and strengthen their ability to shape society as they see fit.

世界秩序的劇烈變化，如大重置，不是自發發生的；相反，它們是由全球決策者設計的，包括有影響力的億萬富翁、政治家、名人、有偏見的學者、富有的慈善家以及國際組織和機構的官僚。這些類型的人支持社會工程，因為它將使他們能夠控制世界財富和自然資源，並增強他們塑造自己認為合適的社會的能力。

Like their predecessors across history, the social engineers of the WEF believe that “there must be no spontaneous, unguided activity, because it might produce results which cannot be foreseen and for which the plan does not provide. It might produce something new, undreamt of in the philosophy of the planner.”1

與歷史上的前輩一樣，世界經濟論壇的社會工程師們認為，“不能有自發的、無指導的活動，因為它可能會產生無法預見的結果，而計劃卻無法提供這些結果。它可能會產生規劃師哲學中無法想像的新東西。”1.

Based on the WEF agenda, the successful completion of the current industrial transformation will require redesigning and controlling every minuscule aspect of human life and behavior, including the private spheres of individuals, the economy, politics, and societal organizations, without the possibility of voluntary and spontaneous cooperation between individuals based on their will, values, thoughts, and beliefs.

根據世界經濟論壇議程，成功完成當前的產業轉型需要重新設計和控制人類生活和行為的每一個微小方面，包括個人、經濟、政治和社會組織的私人領域，而不可能在個人之間基於其意願、價值觀和，思想和信仰。

We were warned almost two centuries ago that when this type of tyrannical power succeeds, it will be “busy with a multitude of small” tasks penetrating “into private life,” governing families, and dictating the “actions” and “tastes of individuals.”2

大約兩個世紀前，我們曾被警告，當這種專制權力成功時，它將“忙於大量滲透”到私人生活的小“任務”，管理家庭，並支配“行動”和“個人品味”。2.

In fact, some of the most ridiculous controls proposed by the WEF included limiting the washing of jeans to no “more than once a month” and “pyjamas once a week.” The WEF also advocates for transforming entire food systems by encouraging people to consume insects, arguing that “insect protein has high-quality properties and can be used as an alternative source of protein throughout the food chain, from feed for aquaculture to ingredients for nutritional supplements for humans and pets.”

事實上，世界經濟論壇提出的一些最荒謬的控制措施包括將牛仔褲的洗滌限制在“每月一次”以內，以及“睡衣每週一次”，世界經濟論壇還主張通過鼓勵人們食用昆蟲來改變整個食品系統，認為“昆蟲蛋白質具有高質量的特性，可以作為整個食物鏈的蛋白質替代來源，從水產養殖飼料到人類和寵物營養補充劑的配料。”

Reforming the food system would also involve eating “cultured meat,” referring to “meat product created by cultivating animal cells in a controlled lab environment.”

改革食品體系還將涉及食用“養殖肉”，即“在受控實驗室環境中培養動物細胞產生的肉製品”。

The WEF also supports the elimination of “car ownership,” as “paying for a ride or delivery is as easy as tapping a smart phone app,” and “renting a vehicle” means that “car loans and insurance payments shrink or disappear.” Ultimately, the Great Reset aims to create a world where “you will own nothing, and will be happy” by 2030, as people will not possess any private property and rent everything they “need in life.”

世界經濟論壇還支持消除"汽車所有權"，因為"支付搭車或送貨的費用就像點擊智能手機應用程序一樣容易"，"租車"意味著"汽車貸款和保險支付縮減或消失"。最終，"大重置 "的目標是到了2030年創造一個"你將不擁有任何東西，並將獲得幸福"的世界，因為人們將不擁有任何私有財產，並向他們租用"生活中需要的一切"。

However, this premise ignores the fact that private property ownership is associated with the advancement of civilizations, higher stages of material and moral development, and the development of modern family life. The WEF scenario would also diminish the sense of security, which is strengthened by the possession of private property.

然而，這一前提忽視了一個事實，即私有財產所有權與文明進步、物質和道德發展的更高階段以及現代家庭生活的發展有關。世界經濟論壇的情況也會削弱安全感，而擁有私人財產則會增強這種安全感。

Once the Great Reset is complete, individuals will essentially have their thinking and decision-making “done for them by men much like themselves, addressing them or speaking in their name.”3 Such a “desire to force upon the people a creed which is regarded as salutary for them is … not a thing that is new or peculiar to our time.”4

一旦 "大重置 "完成，個人的思考和決策基本上將由 "和自己很像的人替他們完成，對他們講話或以他們的名義講話"。3. 這種"將一種被認為對他們有益的信條強加給人民的願望......不是我們這個時代的新事物或特有的東西。4.

However, as various totalitarian regimes throughout history have demonstrated, the oppressive central planning of social engineers leads to the masses’ losing their sense of autonomy, freedom, dignity, creativity, and strength. Also lost is the incentive to improve one’s own condition and contribute to the progress of society.5

然而，正如歷史上各種極權主義政權所證明的那樣，社會工程師的壓迫性中央計劃導致大眾失去自主、自由、尊嚴、創造力和力量。同時，也失去了改善自身狀況和促進社會進步的動力。5.

If the social engineering of the WEF is successful, then, by 2030, one will not be able to rely on oneself, family members, relatives, friends, or the community. This is because the supporters any absolutist regime want traditions and customs to be corrupted, “memories obliterated, habits destroyed, … liberty, chased from the laws.”6

如果世界經濟論壇的社會工程成功，那麼到2030年，人們將無法依靠自己、家人、親戚、朋友或社區。這是因為任何專制政權的支持者都希望傳統和習俗被破壞，“記憶被抹去，習慣被破壞，……而自由則被法律所剝奪”。6.

In other words, they want to design a societal order where sympathy and mutual assistance will be rendered obsolete and where every citizen of the world is equally powerless, poor, and isolated, so that people will be unable to oppose the organized strength of global governance and become dependent on governments and their allies for their survival.

換言之，他們希望設計一種社會秩序，在這種秩序中，同情和互助將變得過時，世界上的每個公民都同樣無能為力、貧窮和孤立，因此人們將無法反對全球治理的有組織力量，並依賴政府及其盟友生存。

Eventually, nothing will protect citizens any longer, and citizens will no longer protect themselves.

最終，任何東西都無法再保護公民，公民也無法再保護自己。

Social engineers of the WEF are essentially advocating for natural freedom, which would allow the strong to exercise their power while subjugating the weak.

世界經濟論壇（WEF）的社會工程師本質上是在倡導自然自由，這將允許強者在征服弱者的同時行使權力。

In doing so, they are basically calling for the world to move backward in the development of human history toward the reinstitution of feudalism and slavery.

他們這樣做，基本上是在呼籲世界在人類歷史發展中倒退，恢復封建主義和奴隸制。

It is important to remember that economic freedom, positive freedom, political freedom, freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are not attributes of primitive man or serfdom; rather, they are products of the most advanced stages of society.

重要的是要記住，經濟自由、積極自由、政治自由、思想自由、言論自由和新聞自由不是原始人或農奴制的屬性；相反，它們是社會最高級階段的產物。

To be more precise, these types of freedom are outcomes of the efforts of countless thinkers, social movements, revolutions, and wars throughout human history.

更準確地說，這些類型的自由是人類歷史上無數思想家、社會運動、革命和戰爭努力的結果。

However, social engineers are not interested in the history and struggles of our civilization, as they believe that they possess expertise in all areas, which is the line of thought at the heart of all dictatorial regimes.7 They do not think that social engineering is alien to the true nature of human beings, even though it is based on “mechanical exactness” and does not “spring from a man’s free choice.”8

然而，社會工程師對我們文明的歷史和鬥爭不感興趣，因為他們認為他們在所有領域都擁有專業知識，這是所有獨裁政權的核心思想。他們並不認為社會工程與人類的真實本性格格不入，儘管它是基於“機械的精確性”而不是“源於人的自由選擇”。8.

Furthermore, advocates of social engineering ignore the fact that “the progress of mankind, in powers of mind and heart, in well-being and in technique, in law and morality, necessarily involves the participation of the lower classes.”9

此外，社會工程的倡導者忽視了一個事實，即“人類的進步，無論是在心智和心靈的力量、福祉還是在技術、法律和道德方面，都必然涉及到下層階級的參與”。9.

Anyone who believes that the social engineers of the WEF have noble intentions at heart as they design and implement the Great Reset should heed the warning of President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1935), who (ironically) declared:

任何人如果認為世界經濟論壇的社會工程師在設計和實施重大重置時，內心都有崇高的意圖，就應該聽從富蘭克林·D·羅斯福總統（1935）的警告，他（諷刺地）宣稱：

The doctrine of regulation and legislation by “master minds” in whose judgment and will all the people may gladly and quietly acquiesce, has been too glaringly apparent at Washington during these last 10 years. Were it possible to find “master minds” so unselfish, so willing to decide unhesitatingly against their own personal interests or private prejudices, men almost godlike in their ability hold the scales of justice with an even hand, such a government might be to the interests of the country; but there are no such on our political horizon, and we cannot expect a complete reversal of all the teachings of history.

在過去的10年裡，由“智囊團”制定的監管和立法原則在華盛頓過於明顯，所有人的判斷和意志都會欣然而平靜地默許。如果有可能發現“智囊團”如此無私，如此願意毫不猶豫地決定反對自己的個人利益或個人偏見，那麼人們在能力上幾乎像上帝一樣公平地掌握正義的天平，這樣的政府可能符合國家的利益；但在我們的政治視野中沒有這樣的東西，我們也不能指望所有歷史教訓都會完全逆轉。

References:
參考文獻：

1. F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (1944; repr., New York: Routledge, 2006), p. 166.

1. FA哈耶克，《通往農奴制之路》（1944年；紐約：勞特利奇出版社，2006年），第166頁。

2. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America: Historical-Critical Edition of “De la démocratie en Amérique,” ed. Eduardo Nolla and trans. James T. Schleifer, bilingual ed., 4 vols. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2010), 1:223.

2. 亞歷克西斯·德·托克維爾，《美國的民主：民主的歷史批判版》，愛德華多·諾拉編，譯。James T.Schleifer，雙語版，4卷。（印第安納波利斯，IN:Liberty Fund，2010），1:223。

3. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books, 2001), p. 261.

3. 約翰·斯圖亞特·密爾（John Stuart Mill），《論自由》（Kitchener，On:Batoche Books，2001），第261頁。

4. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, p. 168.

4. 哈耶克，《通往農奴制之路》，第168頁。

5. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom.
5. 哈耶克，《通往農奴制的道路》。

6. Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 2:156.

6. 托克維爾，《美國的民主》，2:156。

7. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom.

7. 哈耶克，《通往農奴制的道路》。

8. Wilhelm von Humboldt, The Limits of State Action. (1792; repr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).

8. 威廉·馮·洪堡，《國家行動的限制》。（1792年出版，劍橋：劍橋大學出版社，1969年）。

9. Gustav Friedrich Schmoller, “Class Conflicts in General.” (American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1915), p. 519.

9. 古斯塔夫·弗里德里希·施莫勒，“一般的階級衝突”（美國社會學雜誌，第20卷，第4期，1915年），第519頁。

Source: MISES.org
資料來源：MISES.org

原文：https://humansbefree.com/2022/06/the-great-reset-is-turning-back-the-clock-on-civilization.html